
There is a particular kind of language that shows up again and again in independent school marketing.
It appears on websites.
It anchors admissions presentations.
It’s often offered, sincerely, when leaders are asked to describe what sets their school apart.
“Strong academics and a caring community.”
It’s familiar.
It’s positive.
And in most cases, it’s true.
But it’s also doing far less work than schools assume.
Schools don’t rely on phrases like this because they’re unimaginative. They rely on them because the language feels stable—especially in moments when enrollment feels uncertain, or competition feels daunting.
These phrases signal values. They reassure internal audiences. They reflect aspirations schools genuinely hold.
The problem isn’t that the language is wrong. It’s that it’s standing in the way of your REAL school story.
Over time, generic language becomes a shortcut. Instead of articulating what truly differentiates your school, it’s a placeholder for deeper clarity. Instead of forcing hard choices about audience, outcomes, and priorities, it allows your “claim to fame” to remain comfortably broad.
And in school storytelling, broad is rarely effective.
From inside a school, phrases like “strong academics and caring community” feel expansive. They hold multitudes. They allow room for nuance.
From a family’s perspective, they often feel… flat.
Not because families disagree—but because they’ve heard the same words everywhere else. When every school sounds good, families are left doing interpretive work schools should be doing for them:
Generic language doesn’t answer those questions. It simply postpones or ignores them.
When schools realize their language isn’t landing, the instinct is often to add.
More programs. More offerings. More proof points. More detail.
But differentiation doesn’t come from accumulation. It comes from prioritization. The schools that stand out most clearly are rarely the ones that offer the most. They’re the ones that are most precise about:
That clarity allows everything else to fall into place. Without it, even impressive offerings blur together.
When a school has done the work to define its story at a strategic level, language stops being generic because it has something specific to express. Messaging becomes a reflection of intention, not a collection of agreeable phrases.
This is why schools with clear stories don’t sound louder—they sound more like themselves.
They’re not trying to convince every family. They’re helping the right families recognize themselves.
Many schools worry that moving away from familiar language will make them feel exposed. Too specific. Too narrow. Too different.
But the greater risk is remaining so broad that nothing truly registers.
Families aren’t looking for perfection. They’re looking for resonance. They want to feel understood, not impressed. And that only happens when a school is willing to articulate what it stands for.
Strong academics and caring communities may very well be part of that story. They just can’t be the whole thing.
The goal isn’t to replace one set of buzzwords with another. It’s to ensure the language schools use is anchored in meaning that’s shared internally and felt externally. When that happens, messaging gains traction and families gain confidence in their decision.
Not because the school said more. Because it said what matters most.
Differentiation doesn’t come from familiar language. It comes from clarity.
Through my Master School Story Framework, I work with leadership teams to define the deeper story beneath their messaging—so what they say reflects who they are, who they serve best, and why their work matters.
When that foundation is clear, your message stops blending in and starts resonating.








Tell us what you think, or ask us any questions. We’re here to help!